The article argues against the necessity of an Outlander prequel, stating that fans of the popular TV show and book series already possess a comprehensive understanding of the background and history of the characters. The author suggests that a prequel would only serve to capitalize on the show's success and would lack the substance and depth that fans have come to appreciate.

The author explains that a series of prequel novels, focused on the adventures of one of the main characters, would not add anything substantial to the story.

Instead, it would simply rehash events that have already been hinted at or briefly explained in the existing narrative. The article further argues that a prequel would disrupt the current timeline and take away from the suspense and excitement fans experience when reading or watching the original story unfold.

Furthermore, the author asserts that a successful prequel would require a compelling and detailed backstory for the characters. However, Outlander already possesses a rich historical context that has been extensively explored in the main series. Therefore, attempting to delve into the past of the characters at this stage would be redundant and unnecessary.

In conclusion, the article contends that an Outlander prequel is unnecessary and would lack the substance and intrigue that fans have come to expect from the original series. It argues against the need for rehashing the past and emphasizes the importance of allowing the main storyline to continue to captivate and entertain viewers.